The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making
One book, placed in its field — what Hodgkinson, Gerard P., - Starbuck .'s book gets right, where it goes further than the rest, and what the rest of the field adds.
Mike West, Editor · HR Leader Guide · get2great.com/guides/profile-the_oxford_handbook_of_organizational_decision_making
Arrow keys or swipe to move · N for notes · F for full screen
The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making
One book, placed in its field — what Hodgkinson, Gerard P., - Starbuck .'s book gets right, where it goes further than the rest, and what the rest of the field adds.
Mike West, Editor · HR Leader Guide · get2great.com/guides/profile-the_oxford_handbook_of_organizational_decision_making
The problem
Decision Process Quality erodes when it is left to instinct instead of method.
You were taught the moves piecemeal, never the whole model.
The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making · Mike West, Editor · HR Leader Guide
The model
- 01Decision Context Complexity and Uncertainty
- 02Information Quality and Load
- 03Organizational Culture
- 04Decision Aiding Technology and Structure
- 05Group Compositional Diversity
- 06Procedural Rationality
- 07Socio-Political Processes
- 08Collective Sensemaking and Enactment
The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making · Mike West, Editor · HR Leader Guide
Step 1 of 5 · Decision Context Complexity and Uncertainty
Complexity and uncertainty require different responses — decomposition versus hedging — not the same escalation of rigor.
Misconception
Practitioners treat complexity and uncertainty as a single dial where more analysis always reduces both.
Reality
Complexity (many interacting parts) and uncertainty (unknowable outcomes) are distinct; more analysis can tame complexity but often only inflates the illusion of control over genuine uncertainty, where scenario thinking and rapid enactment matter more.
The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making · Mike West, Editor · HR Leader Guide
Step 2 of 5 · Information Quality and Load
Information overload pushes decision makers toward heuristics they haven't validated for the task.
Misconception
More information yields better decisions, so gathering more data is always the safe move.
Reality
Beyond a threshold, added information degrades decisions by inducing overload, delaying action, and increasing spurious pattern-finding; quality and relevance beat volume, and knowing when to stop collecting is itself a competence.
The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making · Mike West, Editor · HR Leader Guide
Step 3 of 5 · Organizational Culture
Culture determines the option set, so it shapes decisions long before deliberation starts.
Misconception
Culture is a soft background factor that can be overridden by good analysis when it really counts.
Reality
Culture operates upstream of analysis by shaping what data counts as relevant and what alternatives are even generated; it constrains rationality precisely when stakes are highest and dissent feels riskiest.
The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making · Mike West, Editor · HR Leader Guide
Step 4 of 5 · Decision Aiding Technology and Structure
A decision tool amplifies the quality of its inputs, so garbage assumptions produce authoritative garbage.
Misconception
Adopting a sophisticated decision tool or framework makes the process more rational by itself.
Reality
Tools and structures are only as good as the questions and assumptions fed into them; they can institutionalize bad framing as easily as good, and they shape behavior most through the routines they enforce rather than the outputs they compute.
The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making · Mike West, Editor · HR Leader Guide
Step 5 of 5 · Group Compositional Diversity
Diversity is a latent resource that requires deliberate process to activate.
Misconception
Assembling a diverse group automatically produces better decisions through varied perspectives.
Reality
Diversity improves decisions only when process elicits and integrates the divergent knowledge; unmanaged, cognitive and functional differences generate conflict and faultlines that suppress the very perspectives they contain.
The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making · Mike West, Editor · HR Leader Guide
A framework to use
Crisis Type and Management Attribute 'Fit' Framework
This framework is part of the full guide. See the guide →
The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making · Mike West, Editor · HR Leader Guide
The cheat sheet
- Decision Context Complexity and UncertaintyComplexity and uncertainty require different responses — decomposition versus hedging — not the same escalation of rigor.
- Information Quality and LoadInformation overload pushes decision makers toward heuristics they haven't validated for the task.
- Organizational CultureCulture determines the option set, so it shapes decisions long before deliberation starts.
- Decision Aiding Technology and StructureA decision tool amplifies the quality of its inputs, so garbage assumptions produce authoritative garbage.
- Group Compositional DiversityDiversity is a latent resource that requires deliberate process to activate.
- Procedural RationalityProcedural rationality is deliberateness matched to stakes, not maximal comprehensiveness.
- Socio-Political ProcessesPolitics is intrinsic to multi-stakeholder decisions and cannot be analyzed away.
- Collective Sensemaking and EnactmentActing on an interpretation partly creates the reality that interpretation described.
The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making · Mike West, Editor · HR Leader Guide
Sources
- The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making — Hodgkinson, Gerard P., - Starbuck .
The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making · Mike West, Editor · HR Leader Guide